31.7.08

Chapter 3 - First Draft

Definition

Industrialized Building System is defined by Sarja (1998) as an organized whole consisting of its part, in which the relations between the parts are defined by rules. The system can be product system, organization system or information system. In open industrialized, product, organization and information are bound together in a system. The system is also defined as a set of parts with holistic potential; that is a set of part organized to act as a whole (Anynomus, 1998). To date there has been no one commonly-accepted or agreed definition of IBS. IBS can mean different things to different industry player. However, the author has gathered few definitions by researchers who studied into this area previously that is reflected to IBS concept accepted by the construction community. According to Eekhout (1989) a building system is as orderly collection of construction elements and construction components with connecting facilities, which can be combined or applied in various ways, in accordance with regulations or agreement and depending to the environment. The building system process is characterized by the following aspects: technology, the human factor, information and organization. The building system products can be characterized by the aspect of function, flexibility, geometry, material, structural, technical capacity, complexity and cost (Gassel, 2003). Rahman & Omar (2006) defined “IBS as a construction system that is built using pre-fabricated components. The manufacturing of the components is systematically done using machine, formworks and other forms of mechanical equipment. The components are manufactured offsite and once completed will be delivered to construction sites for assembly and erection”. Dietz (1971) in earlier literature defined IBS as “total integration of all subsystem and components into overall process fully utilizing industrialized production, transportation and assembly techniques”. Parid (1997) defined IBS as a “system which use industrialized production technique either in the production of component or assembly of the building or both”. Lessing et al (2005) defined IBS as an “integrated manufacturing and construction process with well planned organization for efficient management, preparation and control over resources used, activities and results supported by the used of highly developed components”. Trikha (1999) defined as a “system in which concrete components prefabricated at site or in factory are assembly to form the structure with minimum in situ construction”. IBS also defined as “a set of interrelated element that act together to enable the designated performance of the building” (Warszawski, 1999). Esa & Nurudin (1998) defined IBS as “continuum beginning from utilizing craftsmen for every aspect of construction to a system that make use of manufacturing production in order to minimize resource wastage and enhance value end users”. Junid (1986) defined “IBS as process by which components of building are conceived, planned and fabricated, transported and erected at site. The system includes balance combination between software and hardware component. The software element include system design, which is complex process of studying the requirement of the end user, market analysis and the development of standardize component” (Junid, 1986). Chung & Kadir (2007) defined “IBS as a mass production of building components either in factory or at site according to the specification with standard shape and dimensions and transport to the construction site to be re-arranged with certain standard to form a building”. Almost all the definition of IBS mentioned the prefabrication, off-site production and mass production of building components as a main characteristic of IBS. The scope of IBS infers the construction of buildings rather than civil structure (bridges, tunnels, etc) or engineering projects (chemical plants, water treatments plants, etc). For the purpose of this research, the author had chosen the following definition that representing the whole key concept of IBS: “A construction technique in which components are manufactured in a controlled environment (on or off site), transported, positioned and assembled into a structure with minimal additional site works” (CIDB, 2003)

IBS Classification

Badir (1998) proposed Badir-Razali classification of building system namely conventional, cast in-situ, pre-fabricated and composite building system. Each building system represented by its respective construction method which further characterize by its construction technology, functional and geometry configuration. In Malaysia, CIDB (2003) has classified IBS into five (5) categories which are pre-cast concrete framing panel and box system, steel formwork systems, steel frame system, timber frame system and block work system. Warszawski (1999) classified building system base on construction technology. The systems are classified in four major groups namely, timber, steel, cast-in situ concrete and pre-cast concrete. This systems can be further classified according to geometrical configuration of their main framing components which are linear or skeleton (beam and column system), planer of panel system or three dimensional and box system. Majzub (1977) expounded the relative weight of components as a major factor of system classification as presented in Table X. The factor has significant impact on the transportability of the components and also has influence on production method.

Industrialized Building System (IBS) type of construction in Malaysia according to Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) (CIDB, 2003):

1) Pre-cast concrete-framed building

The pre-cast concrete framed is one of the most popular forms of industrialized building system. The framed building consists of slab, beam and column component that are fabricated or manufactured off- site using machine and formwork. The advantage of the system is high degree of flexibility in term of larger clear distance between columns, as a result longer span give bigger open space and greater freedom of designing floor areas.

2) Pre-cast concrete wall system

This system consist a structural framework of the building composed of pre-cast slab and load bearing wall. The load –bearing walls and slabs are manufactured off-site and transferred at site to be erected. The system is preferred in simple and uncomplicated with a lesser degree of flexibility whereas the removal of load bearing wall are restricted during the service life. With careful design and good coordination between erectors and designers, the erection process can be very fast with the number of wet trade in-site can be reduced significantly.

3) Reinforced concrete Building with Pre-cast concrete slab

This system is also known as hybrid construction as it integrates pre-cast concrete and cast in-situ concrete. It consist a combination of cast in-situ frames with pre-cast concrete hollow core slab or pre-cast planks. It become so popular by the builders because of the benefit of speed and high quality of pre-cast concrete slabs are combined with the benefit of economy, flexibility, monolithic property and structural stability of cast-in situ concrete frame eventually gives a practical and efficient buildings.

4) Steal Formwork System

This system categorized as an IBS because the process of construction is carried out using a systematic and mechanized method that is by using reusable steel formwork panels. The system allows the rapid on-site placement of cast in-situ concrete to form beams, columns, slabs and walls. The system is better preferred for the construction of walls instead of column and beam due to many repetitive of similar wall components in wall frame buildings. Steel formwork components are normally available in standard panel sizes and stiffened using built in stiffeners or tie rods to resist lateral concrete pressure during concreting. It offers faster speed of erection, comparatively lower cost and simplicity in equipment. It also provides good accuracy and smooth internal finishing that eliminate the need of plastering.

5) Steel-framed building and Roof Trusses

Steel, a strong and stiff material is suitable for the construction and of reparative frame building with architectural detailing with high flexibility in providing long-spanning structure. It normally used in for multi story frames for tall and slander building and also for roof construction. The advantages of using steel frame system are buildability and simplicity of construction as well as greater construction speed.

Benefit of IBS to the construction industry

Adopting Industrialized Building System and other pre-fabricated technique has the following benefits to the practitioner when compared to the conventional construction method (Thanoon, 2003):

a) The repetitive use of system formwork made up steel, aluminum, etc and scaffolding provides considerable cost savings
b) Construction operation is not affected by adverse weather condition, because prefabricated components is done in a factory controlled environment
c) Prefabrication takes place at centralized factory, thus reducing labor requirement at site. This is true especially when high degree of mechanization involved
d) An industrialized building system allows for faster construction time because casting of pre-cast element at factory and foundation work at site can occur simultaneously. This provides earlier occupation of the building, thus reducing payment or capital outlays
e) An industrialized building system allows flexibility in architectural design in order to minimize the monotony of repetitive facades
f) An industrialized building system provides flexibility in the design of pre-cast element as well as in construction se that different system may produce their own unique prefabrication construction methods
g) An industrialized building system components produces higher quality components attainable through careful selection of material, use of advanced technology and strict quality assurance control

Open System Vs Closed System

A closed system can be classified into two categories, namely production based on client’s design and production based on pre-caster’s design. The first category is designed to meet a spatial requirement of the client’s that is the spaces required for various functions in the building as well as the specific architectural design. In this instance, the client’s needs are paramount and the pre-caster is always forced to produce a specific component for a building. On the other hand, the production based on pre-caster’s design includes designing and producing a uniform type of building or a group of building variants, which can be produced with common assortments of component. Nevertheless these types of building arrangement can be justified economically only when the architectural design observes large repetitive element and standardization. In respect to this, a novel prefabrication system can overcome the requirement of many standardized elements by automating the design and production process and sufficient demand for a typical type of building such as school so that a mass production can be obtained. The beauty of the system is to allow openness in its structure supplier where everybody can bid to produce lower price. In addition, the pre-caster and erectors will look for cooperation models that will create benefit for both. OBS also provide a high degree of design flexibility but required a maximum coordination between the designer and pre-caster (Thanoon, 2003). OBS also allows the pre-caster to produce a limited number of elements with pre-determined range of product and at the same time maintaining architectural aesthetic value. Moreover, OBS is permitting hybrid application and adaptable to standardization and Modular Coordination (IBS, 2003).

National IBS Roadmaps 2003-2010

To promote IBS adaptation in Malaysia in a systematic way, Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) has published IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 which entailed the needs and requirement of Malaysian construction industry. This roadmap was endorsed by cabinet on 29th October 2003 as a blueprint of total industrialization of construction industry and achieving Open Building by the year 2010. The roadmap is a comprehensive document that divided the IBS program into the five main focus areas that reflect the inputs needed to drive the program, each beginning with M. They are Manpower, Materials, Management, Monetary, and Marketing (CIDB, 2003a). The inputs are then divided into its elements and the activities to be implemented for each element were then identified and included into the time span of the roadmap in order to achieve the mission within the stipulated time-frame. The content of this roadmap is focused towards achieving the industrialization of the construction sector and the longer term objective of Open Building Systems concept. The 5M component element and activities in 2003-2010 timeframe are depicted in Table 2.

One of the important milestones in the roadmap is the introduction of Modular Coordination (MC) concept. MC is a concept of coordination of dimensions and space where buildings and components are dimensioned and positioned in a basic unit or module known as 1M which is equivalent to 100 mm. The system allows standardisation in design and building components (CIDB, 2007a). It will encourage participation from manufactures and assemblers to enter the market, thus reducing the price of IBS components. In essence, MC will facilitate open industrialisation which is the prime target of the roadmaps. The proposed enforcement of using MC through Uniform Building By-Law (UBBL) would encourage the adoption through standardisation and the use of IBS components. However, until the end of 2007, the UBBL have yet to be amended to include MC regulations (CIDB, 2007b).

Another important step taken by the government of Malaysia is to introduce incentives for IBS adopter. The exemption of the levy (CIDB levy - 0.125 % of total cost of the project according to Article 520) on contractors that implanted some kind of IBS in 50% of the building components was introduced effectively from 1st January 2007. In the first half of 2007, 24 residential projects qualified for the levy exemption. It is a very small percentage of total 417 residential projects during that period (CIDB, 2007b). It shows that awareness among developers and contractors on the levy exemption is still very low. IBS Centre established in 2006 at Jalan Chan Sow Lin, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur will be one-stop centre of IBS related programmes initiated by CIDB, provide the training and consultancy on IBS and showcase IBS technology through the demonstration project. The obligation to implement IBS strategies and activities from this centre serves concurrent both to improve performance and quality in construction, also to minimize the dependency of unskilled foreign labors flooding the construction market.

IBS Roadmap Mid-Term Review

The IBS Centre of Malaysia, under the Construction Industry Development Malaysia (CIDB) has published IBS Roadmap Mid-Term Review report in Q4 2007 to review the implementation of IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 document. The report has highlighted the followings (CIDB, 2007):

a) The report discovered that high rise development and factory-like buildings tend to have higher adoption of IBS compared to landed properties and small commercial units
b) Whilst there is no empirical data, there is some anecdotal evidences, suggest that there have been sporadic dumping of sub-standard foreign product in IBS
c) At present, common practice shows manufacture of IBS components are involved only after tender stage of the value chain. IBS need to be addressed in design stages to be successfully adopted
d) Until Q3 2007, there is yet any certification or accreditation of components companies and installers in place
e) The report discovered that smaller contractors view IBS as threats and not as opportunities
f) Lack of integrated action plan to be implement the recommendations of IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 documents
g) It seems that most locally developed products based on traditional material such as reinforced concrete and most using innovative materials are based on imported technology
h) Until Q3 2007, vendor development program has yet been performed
i) Until Q3 2007, the certification of products and installers have yet to be implemented
j) The report discovered that the adoption in Malaysia is client driven rather than end customer’s demand driven
k) Until Q3 2007, only 54 out of 109 IBS Roadmap recommendation’s milestones have been achieved
l) The report discovered that the constructors only use IBS as alternative option either explicitly or trough challenging time, quality demanded by the clients

Barriers to adopting IBS

Despite the plausible advantages, the construction industry’s stakeholders are little bit skeptical on using IBS product. Warszawski (1999) pointed barriers in implementing industrialization in construction industry as the followings; 1.Decline in demand and volatile of building market make an investment in IBS more risky compared to conventional labor intensive method 2. Prefabrication elements are considered inflexible with respect to changes with may required over its life span 3. At university level student are less exposed to technology, organization and design of industrialized building system 4. Repetitiveness and standardization element of IBS cause monotonous ‘barraclike’ complexes that very often turned into dilapidation slump within years 5. An adaptation of standardization requires a tremendous education and training effort. Standardization of building elements face resistance from construction industry due to aesthetics reservation and economic reasons (Kampempool and Suntornpong, 1986). Yousre et al. (2002) highlighted ICT issues, which are concern with the data and information available to the system, users, clients, establishment of manufacturing layout and process, as well as allocation of resources and materials. Transportation of panels and modules is much more difficult than transporting the sum of their part. A 20% damage rate is not unusual during the first couple of years in IBS project (Stone, 1970). More serious is the problem of making joints, locking, gluing, welding, hammering or snapping components together which need time and experience for perfection and reduced wastage. Performance of high quality components is often offset by patchwork or poor fits and by early cracks. Moreover, the method itself involving mechanized system and skilled worker introduces demand of precision not needed in other method (Strassman, 1975). A country cannot afford to build large volume of dwelling or close the housing deficit fast regardless of time saving if these are to be built with imported mould and cranes. Speed of construction converted to monetary saving is very small. Rationality of IBS depend on many factors; design, standard, volume and consistency (Payne, 1977). The government of Malaysia still feels that the usage of IBS is still low despite the plausible potential. From the survey conducted by CIDB of Malaysia in 2003, the usage level of IBS in local construction industry stands at 15% (CIDB, 2003b). Evidently that most of locally developed products are based on traditional materials such as reinforced concrete and the most innovative materials are based on imported technology (CIDB, 2007b). There is no mandatory requirement on any certification or accreditation of components, companies or installers in place. Whilst, there is no empirical data, there is some anecdotal evidence suggests that there has been sporadic dumping of sub-standard foreign products in Malaysia (CIDB, 2007b). A mechanism to ensure IBS products marked to an acceptable standard must be introduced in the manufacturing process. Testing of components, verify and certify them will limit only safe and acceptable IBS panels are erected and thus CIDB will lead this roles. Hussein (2007) also highlighted the barriers are as follows:

I. Mindset problem towards achieving acceptance by the construction community
II. The cost of using IBS exceed the conventional method of construction given the ease of securing cheap immigrant labor
III. IBS design concept is not being taken into consideration at the onset of the project
IV. Designers will not design using components as they not find the components in the market, whilst producers will not produce components as they do not see design using components
V. Lukewarm acceptance of IBS among designers and developers especially from private sectors
Rahman and Omar (2006) highlighted the challenges as follows:

I. The term IBS is often misinterpreted with negative meaning linked with 1960’s industrial building. These building are normally associated with low quality of building and unpleasant architecture appearance
II. Lack of knowledge and exposure to IBS technology and design
III. Lack of local design feasible of IBS system
IV. Lack of investment in heavy equipment and mechanize construction system
V. Lack of general awareness

Hussein (2007) highlighted the barriers are as follows:

VI. Mindset problem towards achieving acceptance by the construction community
VII. The cost of using IBS exceed the conventional method of construction given the ease of securing cheap immigrant labour
VIII. IBS design concept is not being taken into consideration at the onset of the project
IX. Designers will not design using components as they not find the components in the market, whilst producers will not produce components as they do not see design using components
X. Lukewarm acceptance of IBS among designers and developers especially from private sectors
Thanoon et. al. (2003) highlighted the following barriers to IBS implementation in Malaysia:

I. Wide swing in house demand, high interest rate and cheap labour cost
II. Lack of skilled construction workforce
III. Nature characteristics of construction project which are fragmented, diverse and involve many parties
IV. Lack of local R&D and novel building system that use local material,
V. Most past project constructed with IBS in Malaysia were low quality and high construction costs
VI. Insufficient incentive and promotion from the government to use IBS

Warszawski (1999) pointed barriers in implementing IBS:

I. Decline in demand and volatile of building market make an investment in IBS more risky compared to conventional labour intensive method.
II. Prefabrication elements are considered inflexible with respect to changes with may required over its life span
III. At university level student are less exposed to technology, organisation and design of industrialized building system
IV. Repetitiveness and standardization element of IBS cause monotonous ‘barraclike’ complexes that very often turned into dilapidation slump within years
V. An adaptation of standardization requires a tremendous education and training effort

Trikha (1999) cited the hindrance to the use of IBS as the following:

I. Lack of assessment criteria set by the approving authorities to urge the developers to use IBS
II. Poor response to modular coordination despite heavy promotions and incentives from the government. As a result, partial introduction of IBS such as lintels and staircase has not been possible

Rahman (2003) pointed the following snag in IBS implementation:

I. Transport and joining skill cannot overcome inadequate in volume, fixed cost of machinery and structure can push unit cost up if demand is insufficient, which often is the case of absence of public sector support
II. If management and sales cost added, saving by adopting IBS would be less than 10%, Installation of heavier and more complex components would further raise the capital costs, volume requirements and uncertainty
III. IBS can not save the overall labour cost by spending more lighter-weight component, which warrants more labour cost. Any reported larger saving was not due to increase of efficiency, but due to reduction of quality or to use less land
IV. Low labour cost of the clay-brick industry using rudimentary technique and unskilled labour have made made labour intensive methods able to compete successfully with a production process

Chung & Kadir (2007) stated the following shortcoming to IBS implementation in Malaysia:

I. The construction industry is considered fragmented where the whole supply chain get their own strategy and agenda
II. Inconsistence of policy guideline implementation and practice
III. The industry is uncompetitive due to lack of open collaboration. Contractors in Malaysia are obligate to close system and getting supply from the same manufacture throughout the construction.
IV. IBS need mass production to achieve economic viability. However, in Malaysia there is no assurance of continuity in the production of components
V. Local authorities are unlikely to make change in local building regulations that need a lot of time and cost to establish legislative economic condition
VI. Contractors are keen on conventional method because they are familiar with the method. Changing method or trade will need more investment to train the workers, least or buy machinery. As a result small contractors are not interested in IBS

Realizing the implementation of IBS is still to make headway, CIDB through its research arm, Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM) has taken the initiative from the problem identified earlier and continued to conduct three series of workshops session with the industry between 2006 and 2007. After a lengthy deliberation with the stakeholders, it was concluded that the factors contributing to the delays of IBS implementation and other issues related to IBS are as follows (CREAM, 2007):


1. IBS is not popular among design consultants,
2. Lack of knowledge among designers,
The need for mindset change through promotion and education,
The stakeholders face a chicken and egg dilemma,
Lack of support and slow adoption from private sector,
Proprietary systems make it hard to be adopted by designers,
Poor quality products available in Malaysia,
Joints are not standardized making it hard to design as the design will have to be fixed to a particular manufacturer,
Lack of push factor for authorities and responsible government bodies by laws and regulations,
The professionals in Malaysia is lack of technical knowledge about IBS components,
Volume and economy of production in scale IBS components,
Monopoly of big boys, limiting opportunities to other contractors,
Low offsite manufacturing of construction components available in the market,
Require onsite specialized skills for assembly and erection of components,
Lack of special equipments and machinery which hampered work. Need more local R&D, support services, technologies and testing of IBS components,
Mismatch between readiness of industries with IBS targets by the government,
Lack of involvement from Bumiputera contractors as an erectors or manufactures,
To consider IBS design for energy conservation and earthquake design,
Insufficient capacity building for contractors to secure project in construction (G1-G7),
Sustainability of construction industry, government to lead during downturn.

Essential Characteristics of Industrialized Building System

a) Standardization and Tolerance

For accomplishing the requirement of modular coordination, all the components need to be standardized for production. Such standardization of space and elements need prescribing tolerance at different construction stages such as manufactured tolerance, setting out tolerance and erection tolerance, so that the combined tolerance obtained on statistical considerations is within the permitted limits (Trikha, 1999). Production resources can be used in the most efficient manner if the output is standardized. Then the particular process, machinery and workers training can be best absorbed to the particular characteristics of the product.

b) Mass Production

The investment in equipment, human resources and facilities associated with industrialization can be justified economically only when a large production volume is observed. Such volume provides a distribution of fixed investment charge over a large number of product units without unduly inflating their ultimate cost (CIDB Singapore, 1992)

c) Specialization

Large production output and standardization of pre-cast elements allow a high degree of labor specialization with the production process. The process can be subdivided into a large number of small homogeneous tasks. In such condition, workers are exposed to their work repetitiously with higher productivity level

d) Good Organization

High production volume, specialization work and centralization production requires an efficient and experiences organization capable of high level panning, organizing, coordination and control function with respect to production and distribution of the products (Warszawski,1999)

e) Integration, Planning and Control of the Processes

In order to obtain an optimal result, a high degree of coordination must exist between various relevant parties such as designer, manufacture, owner and contractor. This is archived trough integrated system in which all these functions are performed under unified authority (Warszawski, 1999). The design, manufacture, assembly and other related process requires a coherent structure and management from the start to the end in order to reach the goal and deliver a maximum value to the customers. A thorough planning of all activities is therefore required especially in the early stage of projects where extra attention must be paid to design (architectural as well as engineering), planning and preparation. By well prepared processes, complete design when the production starts and the use of separately developed technical system, supported by structured planning methods, the execution of the process will run smooth and with a low amount of defect and errors. The strive is towards zero defects and minimum amount of waste (Lessing et. al, 1999)

f) Production Facility

The initial capital investment for setting up a permanent factory is relatively expensive. Plant, equipment, skilled worker, management resources need to be acquired before production can be commenced. Such huge investment can only be breakeven if there is sufficiently high demand for the products. On the other hand, a temporary casting yard or factory can be established at the project site in order to minimized the transportation costs (Peng, 1986)

g) Transportation

It is found that casting a large panel system can reduce labour cost up to 30 percent. However, these cost savings are partly offset by the transportation costs. The transportation of large panels is also subject to the road department and relevant authorities (Peng, 1986)

h) Equipment at site

For the purpose of erecting and assembling pre-cast panel into their position, heavy crane is required especially for multi-story building. It is therefore important to incorporate this additional cost when adopting a pre-fabrication system (Warszawski, 1999)

Chapter 1 - First Draft

1.1 Rationale

The growing demand of affordable housing, increasing construction cost, lower productivity rate and heightened concern of energy-efficiency has prompted the construction industry to realize the immense benefit of industrialized and automated construction. Despite all plausible advantages, early effort to promote Industrialized Building System (IBS) in Malaysia construction industry has yet to greener a good response. Malaysian construction industry through Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), a government sponsor body has published IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 to guide and assist the construction stakeholders in Malaysia in changing their conventional ‘brick and mortar’ practice for the usage of more automation and pre-manufactured construction components. CIDB is also providing training, consultation and testing facilities for construction practitioners. The author has been sponsored by Construction Industry Development Board, (CIDB) Malaysia that currently promoting IBS in Malaysia. The sponsorship requires the author to seek knowledge on benchmarking and transfer of best practices as potential tool to share knowledge in IBS project and showcasing IBS good practices in other countries for the benefit of Malaysian construction industry. This research will develop a high level understanding on benchmarking and best practice transfer and also on IBS essential characteristics. The output of the research will be presented for Malaysian IBS Steering Committee and IBS Technical Committee for further action and implementation.

1.2 Background

The construction industry and particularly construction companies, is typified by the fact that its business mainly run trough projects. One of the claims is that construction is inherited differently from other industries in that its factory moves around and hardly ever develops the same product twice. One of the topical issues for construction managers is how to avoid reinventing the wheel by sharing good practices and knowledge. However, construction firms are faced with various difficulties when attempting to transfer good practices and put into use in actually. The main argument of these studies is implementing outside good practice and previous practice is not just a matter of copying and quick fix problems, but often requires a three-stage process of abstraction, transfer and application (Lillrank, 1995). In his overview of the construction industry, Rethinking Construction, Sir Egan has urged the industry to create the knowledge centre through the whole industry and all its clients can access to knowledge about good practice, innovation and the performance of companies and projects (Egan, 1998). It appears that the learning strategies recommended by Sir Egan is a best practice sharing. For all research in best practice transfer and benchmarking in construction, this research will be focus on Industrialized Building System (IBS) project’s cases. IBS is defined as a construction technique in which components are manufactured in a controlled environment (on or off site), transported, positioned and assembled into a structure with minimal additional site works (CIDB, 2003). It is classified as a project that use one or a combination of the following systems; pre-cast concrete frame building, pre-cast wall system, reinforce concrete building with pre-cast concrete slab, steel formwork system and steel frame building and roof trusses system. The body of literature on best practice transfer is still much dominated by scholar from management science, psychology, sociology etc. Benchmarking is still an uncharted territory in construction. Therefore, a research conceptual model based on existing benchmarking model is formulated, in order to investigate best practice transfer within the IBS construction perspective of a real life construction setting.

1.3 Problem statement

The construction industry constitutes an important element of Malaysian economy. Although it account for only 2.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007, the industry is critical to national wealth creation as it acts as a catalyst for and has multiplier effects to the economy and also enable other industries namely manufacturing, professional services, financial services, education and others (CIMP, 2007). The construction industry also provides job opportunities for approximately 800,000 people (CIDB, 2007). Nevertheless, the state of the local construction industry is not in line with future development of Malaysia. The construction industry in Malaysia is always connected to insufficient level of quality, a 3D syndrome (Dirty, Difficult and Dangerous), pollution and excessive reliance on unskilled foreign workers. As such, the usage of Industrialized Building System (IBS) components as a part of construction process is a new construction trend introduced by the government of Malaysia to archive three major objectives; a) to promote systematic construction process that put quality, safety and environment issues into account and b) to reduce the dependency on foreign workers and, c) to reduce the overall cost of construction project and introduce value for money concept. For constructors, proper planning, procurement and co-ordination throughout IBS project cycle will give positive outcome in term of reducing construction time and labor cost. Despite all the plausible advantages and support from the government, early effort to promote usage of IBS in Malaysian construction industry has yet to greener a good response. CIDB (2003) reported that construction project using IBS in Malaysia only stands 15% in the year 2003. Completed project using IBS in the year 2006 only 10% (CIDB, 2007) less than one - third of total construction project (using at least one IBS product) in year 2006 (CIDB, 2007) as compare to forecasting IBS project of 50 % in 2006 and 70% in year 2008 (CIDB, 2003). This problem is due to lack of confidence and detail information that is able to convince the construction sector in Malaysia to use IBS technology. Low labor cost in Malaysia is also being identified as the root cause of the problem (CIDB, 2007). Although the members of the industry are open to the idea, a major portion of the industry stakeholders are indifferent, perhaps due to resistance towards change and insufficient information to support feasibility of change. The adoption in Malaysia is more towards client-driven rather than consumer driven as compared to developed countries. The development of ‘factory-like’ buildings (TESCO, Giant, Carrefour etc) tends to have higher adoption of IBS compared to dwellings and small commercial units (CIDB, 2007). Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) highlighted the barriers to IBS adoption in construction industry are as follows (Hussain, 2007); Mindset problem towards achieving acceptance by the construction community, The cost of using IBS exceed the conventional method of construction given the ease of securing cheap immigrant labor, IBS design concept is not being taken into consideration at the onset of the project, Designers will not design using components as they not find the components in the market, whilst producers will not produce components as they do not see design using components, Lukewarm acceptance of IBS among designers and developers especially from private sectors. Lack of best practice sharing and showcasing is a main reason the practitioners are reluctant to change their mindset. As one of the effort to encourage the adoption of IBS in Malaysia construction industry, the research will be conducted to develop best practice benchmarking model that will help the practitioner to benchmark themselves against the best in the industry and share the best practices that are currently being adopted in other organization locally and overseas.

Benchmarking as Research Methodology

Introduction
In recent years, many Benchmarking Models have been proposed by scholars in management science including Xerox Rank’s Model (Camp, 1989), McCabe’s Model (McCabe, 2001), NPC Malaysia’s Model (NPC, 2007) and many more in the case of Royal Mail, IBM, Post Office and Coopers & Lybrand (Zairi, 1994).Until to date, there is no specific model has been developed to benchmark contractor’s performance, process and best practice in Industrialized Building System (IBS), as in the case of this study. Nevertheless, recent paper by Lessing et al. (2005) has charted characterizations of industrialized building and developed a scoring system for level of achievement which could possibly be a ground breaking in IBS’s Benchmarking conceptualization. Later paper by Oostra & Johnson (2007) has compiled an early effort to Benchmark IBS’s building concepts and their best practices. The study been conducted by comparing so called ‘best in the world’ IBS projects around the globe (e.g. Sekesui, Wenswonen, Living Solution etc.) using Lessing’s industrialized characterizations and scoring system as parameter of comparison (Lessing et. al (2005). For this study, the research will use very basic but yet established model by Anderson & Pettersen (1996) depicted in Figure 1. Throughout the study, the model will be modified to suit the aim and objectives of the study. Later, it will be proposed as new and specific model to benchmark IBS companies.
The basic contents of the Benchmarking Wheel are:
Select and document the process to be benchmarked
Identify who perform this process best
Observe and analyze how the benchmarking partner performs this process
Analyze the causes for the gap in performance
Implement improvements based on this analysis
The Benchmarking phases, objectives and relevant questions
Plan
The objective of this phase is to prepare a plan for Benchmarking
§ What subject to be benchmarked?
§ What is the current status of the subject?
§ What is the best data collection method?
Find (Search)
The primary task in this phase is to search for and identify suitable Benchmarking partner
§ What is the list of criteria?
§ How the candidates will be compared and analyze?
§ How networking will be established?
Collect (Observe)
The objective of the phase is to study the selected Benchmarking partners to understand their process. The data will be collected using designed data collection method.
§ How information and data will be assessed?
§ What are the methods and tools for collecting information and data?
§ How data will be observed and debriefed?
Analyze
The objectives of this phase are to uncover gaps in performance, the root cause of the gaps and the enabler that particularly contribute the gaps
§ How the data will be sort and normalized?
§ What are the performance gaps
§ What are the cause and the enabler of the gaps?
Improve (Adapt)
The objective of this phase is to create a positive change and improvement in both benchmarking partner and proposed constructive recommendations in order to gain superior performance
§ What are the recommendations to close gaps and attain superior performance?
§ How the findings will be communicated across the organization?
§ What the implementation plan to improve?
Recycle (Continues improvement trough Benchmarking)
The objective of recycle of phase in wheel is attain continues improvement trough Benchmarking
§ How the benchmarking recommendations will be calibrate?
§ How implementation plan matured and evolve into best practices?

30.7.08

BuHu 9th International Postgraduate Conference

(Abstract Acceptance - 112)

INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM: THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

Kamar, K. 1, Alshawi, M. 1 and Hamid, Z. 2
k.a.mohamadkamar@pgr.salford.ac m.a.alshawi@salford.ac.uk zuhairi@cidb.gov.my
1 The Research Institute for Built and Human Environment (BuHu), University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UNITED KINGDOM
2 Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Level 10, Grand Seasons Avenue, 72, Jalan Pahang, 50772, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA

Abstract:

Industrialized Building Systems (IBS) has been identified as a potential solution to improve overall performance of construction industry like quality, cost effectiveness, safety, waste reduction and productivity. Whereas the advantages are very plausible, the idealism of industrialised construction is far from being practical. In reality, the majority of contractors and housebuilders are not keen to IBS due to cost and risk issues, negative perception on past failures, legislation and regulation, lack of personnel to perform specialised skill, limited IT adoption and lack of guidance. In fact, the use of IBS requires tremendous effort to change existing construction practices and to train the personnel with specializing skills such as assembly and coordination. It leaves the contractors with noticeable difficulties and often fails to reinvent their current roles to suit IBS project. Nevertheless, several contractors had successful in the use of IBS and the authors feel that their critical success factors need to be documented and shared. The critical success factor is defined as the limited number of areas in which satisfactory results will ensure successful performance for the organization. The paper review and analyse literatures conserving critical success factors for contractors to embrace into IBS construction. The factors are proposed as focus area in change management process or as benchmarking scope to imitate successful IBS contractor. The critical success factors for IBS are planning and control of internal process, partnering team, corporate leadership, cost management, human resource and training, supply chain control, extensive IT, standardisation and tolerance and handling, installation and commissioning. The results proposed in this paper however are not conclusive but rather a call for debate and platform to gather feedback form construction observers. More evidence needs to be compiled in order to support this paper and a pilot study will be conducted to validate the arguments which have been highlighted.

Keywords: construction, contractor, Industrialized Building System (IBS), critical success factors

Introduction to the Research

1.1 Project Title
Benchmarking Gap between Malaysia and United Kingdom’s Industrialized Building System (IBS) Contractors and Recommendations to Transfer Malaysian’s G7 Contractors to be an IBS Ready Company

1.2 The Aim
The aims of the research are to identify the gaps between IBS’s contractors in Malaysia and in the United Kingdom trough a comprehensive Benchmarking study and provide constructive recommendations to transfer G7 contractors in Malaysia to be an IBS ready company

1.3 The Objective
To study the steps and phases in Benchmarking Model as a research instrument of the study, To investigate the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of IBS companies and identify information to be benchmarked, To undertake benchmarking study and identify gaps trough a series case studies in UK and Malaysia, To provide constructive recommendations in transferring Malaysian’s G7 contractors to be IBS ready contractors

1.4 Research Question
What are the current Benchmarking steps and phases in management studies?
What are the Critical Success Factors (CSF) and the criteria on IBS to be measured?
What type of information to be collected?
How the factors to be calculated?
What are the criteria to select Benchmarking partner (comparable financially, requirement, logistics, organization and market sector)?
What are the essential characteristics and the Critical Success Factors (CFS) of IBS contractors?
What are the current practices and issues on IBS in the UK and Malaysia?
How the construction companies in UK covert themselves from conventional contractors to IBS ready contractors?
How IBS’s professionals justified the commercial values of IBS?
How IBS’s professionals convince the top management in the company on the benefit of IBS?
What are the current market of IBS in mass-housing development in Malaysia and the UK?
How IBS contractors deal with human resources? Do they need to re-employ or retrain the workers in IBS specialties?
What are the best leadership policy and organization structure for IBS contractors?
How IBS’s contractors change from cost competitive to customer focus and value for money concept?
How the companies change from mass production to mass customization?
What are the role of IT technology in IBS project integration, supply chain and mass-customization of IBS products?
How the IBS’s best practice in UK to be captured and showcased to the G7 contractors in Malaysia?
How the company abstract, implement and routinise the best practice learn from the Benchmarking study and the best practice’s showcased?

Determine What to be Benchmarked

Determine of what to be benchmarked is the most important phase and based on Critical Success Factors (CFS) (Camp, 1989) (Andersen & Pettersen, 1996) and the business function of the company (Zairi,1996) (Andersen & Pettersen, 1996) as long as the factors are; Being crucial to the development of the organization’s ability to provide excellence service and standards to customers and Being those that are in most need of radical change and improvement (McCabe, 2001)

Key Performance Indicator (KPI) then to be identified based on CSF. McCabe (2001) has compiled Benchmarking case studies in construction industry that use CSF and KPI as the area and process to be benchmarked (e.g. AMEC Capital Project Limited case).Critical Success Factors (CSF) – A limited number of factors that highly impact the company’s competitiveness (What) (Andersen & Pettersen, 1996). Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – Measurement on the progress being made to insure that the critical success factors are being achieved. It represents the measures of progress in achievement of the CSF (How) (McCabe,2001).Construct IT (1998) using Key Process Area (KPA) in the area to be investigate and using general principal for specific attribution of KPA to be measured in Benchmarking processes; Strategy, Policy, Procedure

First, mission statement and strategic deliverable must be developed (Camp,1989)

The Mission Statement

“To transform Malaysian G7 contractors to be an IBS ready company by achieving superior level of customer satisfaction at competitive construction cost, increase in productivity and quality and provide safer and sustainable way of doing construction. This can be achieve trough mass-customization in Industrialized Building components and effective use of IT”

Strategic Deliverable of the Benchmarking Process:

a. The level of leadership, business process, Return of Investment (ROI), and managing stakeholder requirements b. The level of effectiveness of Human Resource Management (HRM) c. The level of customer satisfaction trough mass-customization and long term relationship d. Process mapping of several strategic IBS activities e.The level of IT usage in overall business and integration

After careful and responsible consideration, CSFs are developed based on combination of information and data from the following documents:

General literatures on IBS and Off-Site Construction (Warszawski, 1999) (Eichert & Kazi, 2007) (Gibb et al, 2005) (Dietz , 1971) (Habraken, N, J, 1971) (compiled in Cuperus, 2005)IBS’s characteristics and classifications (Thanoon, 2003) (Peng, 1986) (Trikha, 1999) (Richard, 2007).Open Building Manufacturing (OBM) concepts form Manubuild Consortium’s documents and proceedings (Manubuild, 2007).Industrialized characterizations and simplification and scoring system for level of implementation (Lessing et al., 2005) (Oostra & Johnson, 2007) Malaysian IBS Roadmap 2003-2010’s strategic thrusts (CIDB,2003) and its Q4 2007 Mid-Term Review (CIDB,2007). Issues related to IBS implementation in Malaysia (Trikha,1999) (Hussein, 2007) (Hamid et al, 2007) (CIDB, 2007) (Baharuddin & Omar, 2006)The Malcolm Bridge National Quality Award (MBNQA) (McCabe, 2001)

The Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of IBS companies are as follows:

a) Leadership, management and strategic business operation that support IBS adoption and successful in dealing with the stakeholders b) Strategy, policy and procedure on customer focus agenda including establishing long term relationship with customer and mass-customization production c) Human resource policy and management to develop know-how and specialization toward IBS adoption d) Integrated process management including arrangement of building concept, design specification, supply chain and activities at site f) Effective ICT support and integration for the above listed factors

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS (CFS) OF IBS CONTRATORS

Critical Success Factors (CSF) and Sub-categories

1. Management & Business Process
§ Leadership System
§ Organization Structure
§ Product and Service Quality Result
§ Company Operation and Financial Result
§ Procurement & Investment Justification
§ Strategy
§ Policy
§ Procedures
§ ICT Adoption

2.Human Resources Management
§ Human Resource Planning & Evolution
§ Professional Perception
§ Staff Training & CPD
§ Specialization & Know-How
§ Perspective on Foreign Labour
§ Strategy
§ Policy
§ Procedures
§ ICT Adoption

3. Customer Focus and Satisfaction
§ Customer and Market Knowledge
§ Marketing, Customer Perception & Satisfaction
§ Strategy
§ Policy
§ Procedures
§ ICT Adoption

4. Process Management
§ Mass-customization
§ Logistic, Supply Chain and Transportation
§ Design Concept & Integration
§ Management of Information
§ Building Technology & Material
§ Strategy
§ Policy
§ Procedures
§ ICT Adoption

BuHu 9th International Postgraduate Conference

(Abstract Acceptance - 111)

BARRIERS TO INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEMS: THE CASE OF MALAYSIA

Kamar, K. 1, Alshawi, M. 1 and Hamid, Z. 2
k.a.mohamadkamar@pgr.salford.ac m.a.alshawi@salford.ac.uk zuhairi@cidb.gov.my
1 The Research Institute for Built and Human Environment (BuHu), University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK
2 Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Level 10, Grand Seasons Avenue, 72, Jalan Pahang, 50772, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA

Abstract:

Industrialized Building System (IBS) construction has been introduced in Malaysia to cope with over reliance on foreign workers, improving image, quality and productivity of construction related services. To achieve the objectives, IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 has been introduced by the government of Malaysia to guide practitioners, government agencies and professional bodies on the implementation plan. This paper depicted a case study on the usage of IBS technology in Malaysia and highlights current issues and barriers to IBS implementation. Some of the barriers are readiness issues, negative perception from the users and professionals, lack of integration, lack of awareness program, persist technical failures and higher construction cost. This paper reports on literature reviews and analysis on recent publications. Finally, the paper produce recommendations to increase IBS take up in Malaysia. It is hoping that the research will create future path for benchmarking study with other countries and further research to improve IBS implementation in Malaysia.

Keywords: Barriers, Implementation, Industrialised Building System (IBS), Malaysia, Recommendations

2.7.08

Thesis Reference & Bibiliography - Methodology

Cambell D., T., (1975), “Degree of freedom in case studies. Comperative Political studies, 8, 178 – 193

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 352-550.

Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Third Edition), Sage Publication, New York

Descombe, M., (1998), The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects, Open University Press, Independent International Publisher.

Trochim, W. (1999). Pattern Matching for Construct Validity, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando, FL, November 3-6, 1999.

Thesis Reference & Bibiliography - Benchmarking

Dattakumar, R., Jagadesh, R., (2003), A review of literature on benchmarking, Benchmarking: An international Journal, Vol 10, No. 3

Leibfried , Mcnair, (1992), Benchmarking- tools for continues improvement, Harper Collins, New York

Bhutta, S., K., (1999), Benchmarking- best practices: an intergrated approach, Benchmarking: An international journal, Vol: 6, No. 3, pp. 254-268

Greengard, S., (1995), Discover best practices from benchmarking, Personal Journal, November
Maire, J. L, Bronet, V., Pillet, M, (2005), “A typologic of best practices for benchmarking process”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol 12, No.1, pp. 45-60

Zairi, M., Whymark, J. , (2000), “The Transfer of Best Practices : How to build a culture of benchmarking and continues learning”, Benchmarking: An international Journal, Vol: 7, No.2, pp. 146-167

Bemowaski, K. (1991), “The benchmarking bandwagon”, Quality Progress, January

Jarar F., Y., Zairi, M., (2000),“Internal transfer of best practices for performance excellence: a global survey“, Benchmarking: An international Journal, Vol: 7, No.4, pp 239-246

American Productivity and Quality Center (1997); “What is benchmarking” APQC Report, Houstan, TX

Lucas, L., M., (2005),The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices; Journal of Knowledge Management; Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 87-101

H. Malano, M. Burton and I. Makin, Benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector: a tool for change, Irrigation and Drainage 53 (2004), pp. 119–133.

N. Garnett and S. Pickrell, Benchmarking for construction: theory and practice, Construct Manage Econom 18 (1) (2000), pp. 55–63.

M. Kozak and M. Rimmington, Benchmarking: destination attractiveness and small hospitality business performance, Int J Contemp Hospital Manage 10 (5) (1998), pp. 184–188

Koskela L. Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. Tech. Rep. No. 72, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1992.

Osman I, Abdel-Razek RH. Measuring for competitiveness: the role of benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the Cairo first international conference on concrete structures, Cairo Univ., Cairo 2–4 January 1996, vol. 1. p. 5–12.

E. Palaneeswaran and M.M. Kumaraswamy, Benchmarking contractor selection practices in public-sector construction – a proposed model, Eng, Construct Architect Manage 7 (3) (2000), pp. 285–299.

J. Sommerville and H.W. Robertson, A scorecard approach to benchmarking for total quality construction, Int J Quality Reliab Manage 17 (4/5) (2000), pp. 453–466.

S. Mohamed, Benchmarking and improving construction productivity, Benchmarking: An Int J 3 (3) (1996), pp. 50–58.

1.7.08

Thesis Reference & Bibiliography - IBS

Abderrahim, M., Diez, R., Boudjabeur. S., Navarro-Suñer, J. M. and Balaguer, M (2005) An IT Infrastructure and safe collaboration in modern construction site, 22nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC 2005 - September 11-14, 2005, Ferrara (Italy)

Alshawi, M. Goulding, J. Nadim, W. (2007) Training and Education for Open Building Manufacturing: Closing the Skill Gap Paradigm, (edited by) Kazi, A. S., Hannus, M., Boudjabeur, S., Malone, A. (2007), Open Building Manufacturing – Core Concept and Industrial Requirement’, Manubuild Consortium and VTT Finland Publication, Finland

Agapiou A.,Clausen L.E., Flanagan R.,Norman G., Notman D.(1998) The role of logistics in the materials flow control process, Construction Management and Economics, Volume 16, Number 2, pp. 131-137(7)

Ball, M. (1996) Housing and Construction: A Trouble Relationship?, The Policy Press, Bristol

Barlow, J., (2000)Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects, Research Policy, 29(7-8), 973-89.

Barlow, J., Ozaki, R. (2003) Achieving ‘Customer Focus’ in Private Housebuilding: Current Practice and Lessons from Other Industries, Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 87–101, 2003

Blismas, N. G., Pasquire, C. & Gibb, A. F. G. (2003) IMMPREST, Loughbrough University, Loughbrough

Blismas, N., G., Pasquire, C. & Gibb, A. F. G. (2006) Benifit Evaluation of Offsite Production in Construction, Construction Management & Economics, 24, 121-30

Blismas, N. (2007) Offsite Manufactured in Australia: current state and future direction, Corporative Research Centre for Construction Innovation, Brisbane

Blayse A. M & Manley, K. (2004) Key Influence of Construction Innovation, Construction Innovation, Vol 4, No 3, pp 1-12

Bock, T., Unser, R., Clausen, T. & Miewald, T. (2007) Crossover Design, the proceedings of 1st Manubuild Conference, April 2007, Rotherdam

Bresnen, M., Marshall, N. (2000) Partnering in Construction: A Critical Review of Issues, Problems and Dilemmas, Construction Management and Economics, 18, 229-237.

Bullen, C.V. & Rockhart, J.F., (1981) A primer on critical success factors (Working Paper No. 69), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Centre for Information Systems Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Camp, R (1989) Benchmarking: the Search for Best practice that Lead to Superior Performance, Quality Press, New York

Chung, L. P. & Kadir, A. M. (2007) Implementation Strategy for Industrialized Building System. PhD thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru

CIB (Construction Industry Board) (1997) Partnering in the Team, in A Report by Working Group 12 of the Construction Industry Board, London, Thomas Telford.

Clarke, L. (2002) Standardisation and Skills; A transnational study of skill, education and training for pre-fabrication in housing, University of Westminister Business School, London

Clarke, L. & Herrmann, G. (2004) Cost vs Production: disparities in social housing construction in Britain and Germany, Construction Management & Economics, 22(5), 521-32

Construction Industry Master Plan (CIMP 2006 – 2015) (2007), Construction Industry Development Board Publication, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

Cuperus, Y (1998) Lean Building and the Capacity to Change, Open House International, 23, No 2, pp 5-13

Din, H. (1984) Industrialised Building and its Application in Malaysia, Proceeding of Prefabrication Building Construction Seminar, Kuala Lumpur

D. Drew and M. Skitmore, The effect of contract type and size on competitiveness in bidding, Construction Management and Economics 15 (1997), pp. 469–489

Esa, H. and Nurudin, M. M. (1998) Policy on Industrialised Building Systems, Colloquium on Industrialised Construction Systems, Kuala Lumpur

Egan, J. (1998), Rethinking Construction, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), London, Report of the Construction Task Force on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of the UK Construction Industry

Eichert, J., Kazi, A. S. (2007) Vision and Strategy of Manubuild- Open Building Manufacturing (edited by) Kazi, A. S., Hannus, M., Boudjabeur, S., Malone, A. (2007), Open Building Manufacturing – Core Concept and Industrial Requirement’, Manubuild Consortium and VTT Finland Publication, Finland

Faizul, N.A, Mustafa, W.AW (2006) Why Knowledge Management is Crucial to the Realization of IBS Roadmap 2003-2010 Implementation, IBS Digest, Issue 2, pg 4, 2006, Kuala Lumpur

Faizul (2006), Supply Chain Management in IBS Industry, proccedings in Malaysian International IBS Exhabition, Kuala Lumpr

Gibb, A (2001), Standardization and pre-assembly – distinguishing myth from reality using case study research, Construction Management and Economics 19(3), 307–315

Gibb, A. (2001) Pre-assembly in construction: A review of recent and current industry and research initiatives on pre-assembly in construction, CRISP Consultancy Commission – 00/19, May 2001

Gibb, A., Isack, F. (2003) Re-engineering trough pre-assembly: client expectation and drivers, Building Research Information 31(2) 146-160

Gue, S. S. (2007) Bridging the Gap between R&D and Construction Industry, Keynote address at Construction Industry Research Achievement International Conference, Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC). Kuala Lumpur.

Goodier, C. & Gibb, A. (2004) Barriers and Opportuities for Offsite Production, PROSPA, Luoghbrough University, Loughbrough

Goodier C. & Gibb, A. (2006) Future opportunities for off-site in the UK, Construction Management and Economic, 25, 6, 585-595

Goodier, C. & Gibb, A. (2005) The value of UK Market for Off-site, Buildoffsite, London

Gould, F. E. (2005) Managing the construction Process (3rd Edition), Prantice Hall, New Jersey

Gray, C. & Flanagan, R (1989), The Changing Role of Specialist and Trade Contractors, The Chartered Institute of Buildings, London

Hervas, F. C., Ruiz, M. I. V. (2007) Stakeholders Requirement for Open Building manufacturing (edited by) Kazi, A. S., Hannus, M., Boudjabeur, S., Malone, A. (2007), Open Building Manufacturing – Core Concept and Industrial Requirement’, Manubuild Consortium and VTT Finland Publication, Finland

Hussein, J. (2007) Industrialised Building Systems: The Challenge and The Way Forward. Keynote Address at Construction Industry Research Achievement International Conference, Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC). Kuala Lumpur.

Hofman, E., Halman,J., Voordijk, H. (2007) Aligning product architecture design and sourcing decisions in the house-building industry, the proceedings of 1st Manubuild Conference, Rotterdam

Hong-Minh, S.M., barker, R. and Naim, M.M. (2001), Identifying Supply Chain Solution in the UK Housing Building Sector, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 49-59

Housing Forum (2001) Enimies of promise, Housing Forum, London

Hamid, Z., Kamar, K. A. M., Zain, M., Ghani, K., Rahim, A. H. A. (2008) Industrialized Building System (IBS) in Malaysia: the current state and R&D initiatives, Malaysia Construction Research Journal, Vol. 2 (1), pp 1-13

IBS Roadmap (2003-2010) (2003) Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), Kuala Lumpur

IBS Roadmap Review (Final Report) (2007), 2007, IBS Centre, Construction Industry Development Board, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (unpublished)

IBS Steering Committee (2006) Minute Meeting of IBS Steering Committee, Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (unpublished)

IBS Survey 2003 (2003), Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB), Kuala Lumpur

Ingram, H., Biermann, K., Cannon, J., Neil, J. and Waddle, C. (2000) Internalizing action learning: a company perspective, Establishing critical success factors for action learning courses, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 12 (2) (2000), pp. 107–113

Jaselskis, E., J., Anderson, M., R., Charles T. Jahren, Y., Rodriguez, S. (1995) Radio-Frequency Identification Applications in Construction IndustryJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 189-196.

Jaeger, J (2007) InPro- Integrated project within the 6th Framework Program, the procedings of 1st Manubuild Conference, April 2007, Roterdam

Johansson, M., Lassl, V., Löfgren, P., Engström, B. & Kliger, R (2007) Standardised information flow for connections in industrialised construction, 1st Manubuild Consortium, April 2007, Roterdam

Junid, S.M.S. (1986), Industrialised Building System, Proceedings of UNESCO/ FEISEAP Regional Workshop, Universiti Putra Malysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor.

Kumaraswamy, M., Dulaimi, M., (2001) Empowering innovative improvements through creative construction procurement, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5-6), 325-35.

Krogt, F and Warmerdam, J (1997), Training in Different Types of Organizations: Differences and Dynamics in the Organization of Learning at Work, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8, Part 1, pp 87- 105

Leonard, D. (2001), CONCUR: Joining up Construction, paper ECCE 2001-24, Construction Informatics Digital Library, e-construct publication

Lessing, J., Ekholm, A. and Stehn, L. (2005) Industrialized Housing – Definition and Categorization of the Concept. 13th International Group for Lean Construction, Australia, Sydney

Lingham, T. et al. (2006). An evaluation system for training programs: a case study using a four-phase approach, Career Development International, 11 (4), pp. 334-351

Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z., Cheng, E., Li, H., (2002) A model for supporting inter-organisational relations in the supply chain, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), 2-16.

Lusby- Taylor, P., Morrison, S., Ainger, C. & Ogden, R. (2004) Design and Modern Method of Construction, Commission of Architecture and Built Environment (CABE), London

Malaysian Construction Outlook 2007 (2007) Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB), Kuala Lumpur

Manubuild (2008), Open Building manufacturing, Manubuild Newsletter, 7, March 2008, Manubuild Consortium

Martinez, S., Barcena, C, Balaguer, J., Navarro, J. M., Bosch, C., Rubia, A., (2007) User Oriented Interactive Building Design (edited by) Kazi, A. S., Hannus, M., Boudjabeur, S., Malone, A. (2007), Open Building Manufacturing – Core Concept and Industrial Requirement’, Manubuild Consortium and VTT Finland Publication, Finland

Ministry of Finance Malaysia (2005) Economic Report Malaysia 2004-2005, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (Unpublished)

Miozzo, M., Dewick, P., 2002, Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction, Research Policy, 31(6), 989-1008.

Nam C. H. & Tatum C. B. (1997) Leaders and champions for construction innovation, Construction Management and Economics, Volume 15, Number 3, pp. 259-270(12)

Naim, M. & Barlow, J. (2003), An innovative supply chain strategy for customised housing, Construction Management & Economics. 21 (6), 593-602

NST (2008) Plan to replace foreign workers with locals (newspaper cutting achieved on 15/9/2008) New Streets Times Malaysia Press, Kuala Lumpur

NPC (2007) Guidebook on Benchmarking for Best Practice, National Productivity Corporation of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

Oostra, M., Joonson, C., C. (2007) Best practices: Lesson Learned on Building Concept (edited by) Kazi, A. S., Hannus, M., Boudjabeur, S., Malone, A. (2007), Open Building Manufacturing – Core Concept and Industrial Requirement’, Manubuild Consortium and VTT Finland Publication, Finland

Palmer, S., Jones, K., Coffey, M. & Blundell, C. (2003) Innovation in Construction: Maintenence and the Egan Agenda, The Palmer Partnership, Dartford.

Pan W., Gibb, A., Dainty, A. R. J. (2007) Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of off-site modern method of construction, Construction Management and Economic, 25, 2, 183-194

Pan W., Gibb, A., Dainty, A. R. J. (2008) Leading UK housebuilders utilization of off-site construction method, Building Research & Information, 36, 1, 56-67

Parid, W. (1997), Global Trends in Research, Development and Construction, Proceeding of the International Conference on Industrialised Building System (IBS 2003), CIDB Malaysia.

Payne, G. K. (1977), Low Income Housing in the Developing World, John Wiiley & Sons, New York

Peng, C.S., (1986), The scenario of Industrialised Building System in Malaysia. Proceeding INESCO/FEISEAP Regional Workshop. UPM, Malaysia

Putnam, A.O. (1985) `A redesign for engineering,’ Harvard Business Review, May-June, 31(3), 139-44.

Quinn, J.B. (1985) `Managing innovation: controlled chaos,’ Harvard Business Review, May- June, 31(3), 78- 84.

Ranns, R. H. B, Ranns, E. J. M (2005) Practical Construction Management, Taylor & Francis, New York

Razak, M. E (2008), Causes Delays in Building Construction Project in Egypt, Journoul of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol: 134, Issues:11, p831-841

Rahman, A. B. A, Omar, W. (2006) Issues and Challenge in the Implementation of IBS in Malaysia, Proceeding of the 6th Asia Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ASPEC 2006), 5-6 September 2006. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Rockhart, J.F. & Crescenzi, A.D., (1984) Engaging top management in information technology, Sloan Management Review 25 (4), pp. 3–16

Sanderson, G. (2003) Strategic review of the use of modern methods of construction in new build and refurbishment housing projects, unpublished Richard Hodkinson Consultancy report

Sears, S. K., Sears, G. A., Clough, R. H. (2008) Construction Project Management, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey

Sharp, M., Jones, K., Coffey, M. (2007) Attitudes towards pre-fabricated housing: The training conundrum, the proceedings of 1st Manubuild Conference, April 2007, Rotherdam

Sleezer, C (1993), Training Needs Assessment at Work: A Dynamic Process, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 4, Part 3, pp 247-264

Sun, M & Howard, R (2004) Understanding IT in Construction, Spoon Press, London

Stone, P. A. (1970) Urban Development in Britain – Standard, Cost and Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Strassmann, W.P (1975), Industrialised System Building for Developing Countries – a discouraging progress. International Technical Co-operation Centre Review, 4, pp 99-113

Swee, H. P. (1998) Malaysia, A review of industrialized building systems. Pp. 133 - 141. 28. Edited by Sarja in Open and Industrialised Building, E & FN Spoon, London

Thanoon, W. A. M., Peng, L. W., Abdul Kadir, M. R., Jaafar, M.S. and Salit, M.S. (2003), The Experiences of Malaysia and Other Countries in Industrialised Building System in Malaysia, Proceeding on IBS Seminar, UPM, Malaysia

Trikha, D. N. (1999) Industrialised Building System: Prospect in Malaysia, Proceeding of
World Engineering Congress, Kuala Lumpur.

Van de Ven, A. H. (1986) Central Problem in the Management of Innovation, Management Science, 32 (5), 590-607

Venables, T., Barlow, J. & Gann, D. (2004) Manufacturing Excellence: UK Capacity in Off-site Manufacturing, Housing Forum, London

Verweij, S., Voorbij, L. (2007) Scenarios for Future Development of Flexible Housing, Proceedings of Manubuild Conference, 25 – 26 April 2007, Rotterdam

Warszawski, A. (1999) Industrialized and Automated Building System, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, E & FN Spoon

Winch, G.M., 2000, Innovativeness in British and French construction: the evidence from Transmanche-Link. Construction Management and Economics 18(7), 807-18.

Woo, G., D. & Ellis, R. C. T (2005) Main contractor experience pf partnering relationship on UK construction projects, Construction Management & Economic, 23 (3), 317-325